Showing posts with label universal periodic review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label universal periodic review. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

SUMMARY OF SWAZILAND UPR

The International Service for Human Rights (ISHR) in Geneva has produced a summary of Swaziland's universal periodic review (UPR).

It notes that Swaziland claimed it was considering ratifying the Optional Protocol on the Convention Against Torture (HERE).  

Key recommendations out of Swaziland's UPR include:

  • Take immediate measures to ensure the independence of the judiciary.
  • Ease legislative requirements regarding the registration of independent media.
  • Allow for the registration and operation of political parties and ensure free, transparent, and regular elections.
The full summary can be read HERE.

For further information about removing the ban on political parties, see my blog HERE.


Tuesday, October 4, 2011

UPR ADVANCE QUESTIONS NOW AVAILABLE


Swaziland has been given notice that it will have to furnish answers to the following questions at the Human Rights Council (HERE):

SWITZERLAND

Political rights
What measures does the government plan to take in order to lift the ban on political parties?
Women’s rights
How will Swaziland remedy the limitation of the rights of women e.g. in not enabling them to acquire a bank loan or own property without the written consent of their husbands?
Freedom of expression
What is Swaziland doing to facilitate the establishment of privately owned media houses?
Human Rights Commission
What measures is the Government planning to take to strengthen the mandate the Human Rights Commission and guarantee the access of the Swazi people to the Commission?
Extra-judicial killings and torture
How many judicial investigations into alleged extrajudicial killings and torture have the Swazi authorities undertaken so far? What was the outcome of these investigations?
How does Swaziland respond to recommendations by Swazi civil society groups to establish commissions of inquiry into all deaths that occur while in the hands of the State police, the army, correctional services and game rangers?
Death Penalty
Does the government of Swaziland foresee to impose a moratorium on executions with a view to the abolition of the death penalty?"

UNITED KINGDOM

We would be grateful if you would provide information on the extent to which civil society was consulted in the preparation of your national report.

Please could you inform us as to when enabling legislation to fully operationalize the Commission on Human Rights and Public Administration will be passed, and whether the Commission will operate in accordance with the Paris principles designed to guide the practice of such institutions?

We would be grateful if you could explain why, despite the fact that the current percentage of women in parliament is 23%, Section 86(1) of the Constitution (which provides for the election of four additional women if the number of women in parliament does not reach 30%) has not been used.

What plans do you have to ratify the Optional Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment?

What measures is Swaziland taking to investigate and prosecute state agents who violate human rights?

Please could you explain what measures are being taken to ensure that the Suppression of Terrorism Act of 2008 is compatible with Section 24 of the Constitution which provides for freedom of expression?

Please could you explain what plans you have to rectify the minority status of women in customary law?

What plans do you have to enact legislation protecting the right to freedom of sexual orientation?

NETHERLANDS

Political reform
Demands for political reform in Swaziland have swelled as a result of the sharp economic turndown, starting early 2011. We have received reports that the government has responded harshly to these demands. In paragraph 103 of the national report, the government acknowledges these challenges and constraints by stating that the Law enforcement agents have a challenge of striking a balance between enforcement of the provisions of the STA and respect for the human rights to freedom of expression and association.  Taking into account paragraphs 75 – 77 of the national report about freedom of association and paragraphs 78-80 of the national report about freedom of expression, could the government respond to the allegations of a harsh response? How is the government planning to address these challenges? Could the government elaborate on the other challenges it is facing in light of the economic turndown? How does the economic turndown affect for instance the right to education, as mentioned in paragraphs 31 – 40?

Rule of Law
We took note of paragraph 40 of the OHCHR-compilation, which states that the realization of the freedom of expression and media freedom has been restricted by the Suppression of Terrorism Act 2088. Could the government respond to this paragraph and elaborate on the question whether these restrictions also apply to members of opposition movements? If so, in what way is the independent judicial review of these particular cases being guaranteed, especially as some provisions are deemed unconstitutional?

NORWAY

What steps are taken to strengthen and ensure the freedom of assembly and association in Swaziland? What steps will be taken to ensure that a space for plurality of opinion and political groups is created and maintained?  What steps are being taken to repeal the 1973 Royal decree?

We note the allegations concerning the excessive use of force by law enforcement and security officials.  Reports also refer to lack of investigation in order to bring perpetrators to justice.  We would appreciate to be informed on how the Government will proceed to alter this situation and practice.

In line with Swaziland’s commitments under the Convention against Torture and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, what are the measures taken to eradicate torture and other forms of ill-treatment?

What are the measures taken to prevent all forms of discrimination against women, including discriminatory cultural practices?

SLOVENIA

What kind of measures have been and will be taken by Swaziland to effectively ensure the gender equality?

SWEDEN

Taken positively note of that the Constitution includes a rights catalogue, Sweden would like to ask the Government of Swaziland to elaborate on the measures taken to harmonize national legislation with the prohibition of torture and ill-treatment and freedom of assembly, as stipulated in the Constitution and in relevant international human rights conventions.

Sweden would like to ask what measures the Government of Swaziland is taking to ensure that the National Commission for Human Rights and Public Administration could serve as an independent and effective tool for the protection of human rights?

Sweden would like to ask the Government of Swaziland to elaborate on the measures taken to ensure that its legislation with regard to terrorism is not in breach of its international obligations.

The answers can be watched live here on Channel 11:


In about an hour and a half, if I have my facts straight.

UPR QUESTION RE 1973 DECREE

In about two hours (3PM Mbabane time), Swaziland will be answering questions about its human rights record before the Human Rights Council.  The advance questions are now available (HERE).

Norway is asking the following question about the 1973 Decree:


·         What steps are taken to strengthen and ensure the freedom of assembly and association in Swaziland? What steps will be taken to ensure that a space for plurality of opinion and political groups is created and maintained?  What steps are being taken to repeal the 1973 Royal decree?

The answer can be watched live here:


For English, click on Channel 11.

Tuesday, September 20, 2011

SUBMISSIONS TO UPR NOW AVAILABLE

For those interested, the submissions made to the UN for the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) are now available:

http://www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/UPR/Pages/UPRSZStakeholdersInfoS12.aspx

Submissions have been made by the Centre for Human Rights at the University of Pretoria, Amnesty International and Action for Southern Africa among others.  There is also a submission by the Swazi Human Rights Commission.

Swaziland's review comes up on 4 October 2011.

Wednesday, August 31, 2011

REPORTING TO THE UN TREATY BODIES

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights' (OHCHR) compilation of stakeholders' report for the universal periodic review is now available (HERE).  One of the items it reports on is Swaziland's commitment to reporting under the UN treaty regime.  In this regard, it states:

"[Amnesty International] noted that Swaziland had a poor record of reporting on the implementation of its international human rights treaty obligations.  [Joint Submission 1] recommended that Swaziland take its reporting obligations under the various international instruments seriously and report accordingly."


Looking at the OHCHR compilation of UN reports (HERE), it is hard to disagree with this argument.  At p 4, it has the following table:


Treaty body
Latest report  submitted and considered
Reporting status
CERD
1996
Fifteenth and nineteenth reports overdue since 2006
CESCR
Initial report overdue since 2006
HR Committee
Initial report overdue since 2005
CEDAW
Initial report overdue since 2005
CAT
Initial report overdue since 2005
CRC
2005
Combined second to fourth report due April 2011

Abbreviations:
CERD   Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination
CESCR Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
HR Committee  Human Rights Committee
CEDAW  Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women
CAT   Committee against Torture
CRC    Committee on the Rights of the Child
CRPD  Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.

The committees have responsibility for overseeing their corresponding conventions.  The Human Rights Committee is the body which oversees the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.

With four out of (a rather paltry) six treaties having never been reported on and the last report being six years ago, it is hard to say that a commitment to report is there. It will be interesting to see whether this is raised with the Swazi government during question time, which will happen on Tuesday 4 October 2011 3PM-6PM Mbabane time (GMT+2).  It can be watched here:

http://www.un.org/webcast/unhrc/index.asp

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

UN HUMAN RIGHTS REPORTS AVAILABLE

Three reports on the human rights situation in Swaziland are now available from the UN Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR).  These are the documents which will form the basis for the human rights review under the new UN human rights mechanism, the universal periodic review (UPR).

The reports are the:

(1) National report - the submission on the human rights situation in the country compiled by the Swazi Ministry of Justice (click HERE);

(2) Compilation of UN information - a summary of reports of the UN 'treaty bodies' (committees established by different treaties, for example, the Committee on the Rights of the Child, which oversees the Convention on the Rights of the Child) (click HERE);

(3) Summary of stakeholders' information - an OHCHR compilation of submissions made by civil society organizations and the Human Rights Commission (click HERE).

The next step is for countries to put Swaziland 'on notice' about questions the country will be expected to answer when it fronts the Human Rights Council on Tuesday 4 October 2011 from 3PM-6PM (Mbabane time; GMT+2). That meeting can be watched live (with a good Internet connection) here:

http://www.un.org/webcast/unhrc/index.asp

Now to find a good Internet connection...